Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era, upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours.

What did the Supreme Court decide in Muller v Oregon quizlet?

Terms in this set (4) A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.

Who decided Muller v Oregon?

majority opinion by David J. Brewer. The Court unanimously upheld the Oregon regulation. The Court distinguished Lochner v.

What was ironic about the 1908 Supreme Court case Muller v Oregon?

State of Oregon, U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1908 that, although it appeared to promote the health and welfare of female workers, in fact led to additional protective legislation that was detrimental to equality in the workplace for years to come.

Why is Muller v Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?

This was a landmark Supreme Court decision because it relates to both sex discrimination and labor laws.

What did Muller v Oregon do?

Muller v. Oregon (1908) is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a state could limit the amount of hours a woman could work while not also limiting the hours of men. … On September 4, 1905, he required a female employee to work more than ten hours in a single day.

Which of the following is true of the Supreme Court's decision in Muller v Oregon?

Which of the following is true of the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller v. Oregon? In reaching its decision, the Court considered scientific evidence showing the harmful effects of long working hours.

Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision in Muller give reasons for your answer?

Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller? Give reasons for your answer? Yes, Muller broke the law that was in place.

Why did Muller v Oregon cause controversy?

In Muller vs. Oregon, a laundry owner argued that limiting women to a ten-hour work day was an unconstitutional violation of their right to choose their own employment. Due in large part to a unique legal brief by Louis Brandeis, the Supreme Court concluded that the states could limit the working hours of women.

Who was president during Muller v Oregon?

(1837-1910): Brewer, an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1889-1910), was appointed to the High Court bench by President Benjamin Harrison. He delivered the unanimous opinion in the Muller v. State of Oregon case.

Article first time published on

Who was Curt Muller?

Curt Muller, the owner of a laundry business, was convicted of violating Oregon labor laws by making a female employee work more than ten hours in a single day. Muller was fined $10.

What piece of evidence might Louis D Brandeis have used to support his argument in Muller v Oregon?

Brandeis served as Oregon’s attorney. As a part of his argument, Brandeis produced a study that provided evidence that illustrated a direct link between long hours of work and women’s health.

Why did the Muller v Oregon cause controversy quizlet?

the Court struck down the minimum wage law as unconstitutional, arguing that it violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.

What did Bunting v Oregon accomplish for Americans?

Oregon, 243 U.S. 426 (1917), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a ten-hour work day, which was accepted for both men and women, but the state minimum-wage laws were not changed until 20 years later.

What is Brandeis brief method?

The Brandeis brief was a pioneering legal brief that was the first in United States legal history to rely more on a compilation of scientific information and social science than on legal citations. … The brief was submitted in support of a state law restricting the number of hours women were allowed to work.

How do you cite Muller v Oregon?

U.S. Reports: Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908).

Who won Holden V Hardy?

He also argued that the statute was unconstitutional because it was class legislation which singled out managers in the mining industry, depriving them of equal protection of the laws. The trial court found Holden guilty and fined him fifty dollars, which he refused to pay.

What was the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Lochner v New York?

In Lochner v. New York (1905), the Supreme Court ruled that a New York law setting maximum working hours for bakers was unconstitutional.

Who won West Coast v Parrish?

In West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937), the Supreme Court ruled, 5-4, that Washington State could impose minimum wage regulations on private employers without violating the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment.

What is the significance of Schenck v United States?

In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court invented the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual’s free speech rights under the First Amendment.

What did the law call for in Adkins?

In 1918, Congress passed a law to set minimum wages for women and children in the District of Columbia. … Adkins and the two other members of a wage board.

Which Supreme Court case established the new legal precedent that declared that a mandated minimum wage between an employer and an employee is constitutional?

United States v. Darby Lumber Co.Full case nameUnited States v. Darby Lumber Co.

How does the Courts decision in Muller differ from its decision in Lochner?

In Lochner , the Court overturned a New York State law meant to regulate the hours that bakers could work, but three years later, in Muller , the justices upheld an Oregon regulation limiting the hours that women could work.

What effect do you think the Court's decision in the Dred Scott case had on the efforts of many Americans to end slavery quizlet?

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case struck down the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional, maintaining that Congress had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories.

What effect do you think the courts decision in the Dred Scott case had on the efforts of many Americans to end slavery quizlet?

Thus Scott’s claim that he had been in free territory where slavery was not permitted was invalid. What effect did the court’s decision in the Dred Scott case have on the efforts of many Americans to end slavery? This decision severely hampered legal efforts to end slavery through court procedures.

In what sense can the Brandeis brief in Muller v Oregon be considered a turning point in the law?

Most importantly, it was a turning point in constitutional law because the court for the first time accepted the persuasive authority of the “Brandeis brief,” thereby admitting the relevance of the social sciences into constitutional adjudication.

What did Louis Brandeis accomplish?

From Brandeis briefs to the right to privacy to a focus on pro bono work, Justice Brandeis shaped the development of both law and the legal profession, and he is widely regarded as one of the most influential figures to ever serve on the Supreme Court.

What were the 2 court cases that famously used the Brandeis brief?

In 1907, Florence Kelley and Josephine Goldmark hired Louis D. Brandeis to represent the state of Oregon in Muller v. Oregon (208 US 412), a case before the US Supreme Court that involved the constitutionality of limiting hours for female laundry workers.

What was Muller v Oregon quizlet?

Terms in this set (4) A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.

What was the Brown vs Board of Education quizlet?

The ruling of the case “Brown vs the Board of Education” is, that racial segregation is unconstitutional in public schools. … The Supreme Court’s decision was that segregation is unconstitutional.

What about Woodrow Wilson appeared to Theodore Roosevelt's supporters like a relic of the past?

What about Woodrow Wilson appeared to Theodore Roosevelt’s supporters like a relic of the past? Wilson was committed to programs that aided small businessmen and seemed to deny the inevitability of economic concentration.